Similarely, if someone is studying something that makes extensive use of mathmatics, then they should be able to understand how the math works.Ī better analogy might be, you would expect an engineer to understand how the diagnostic tools that he uses work. However, if someone is a electrical engineer, they had better know how they work. So, there is no reason why someone who is not an electrical engineer should be able to understand how a transitor works. They are not attempting to become professionals in these feilds. Your above examples are flawed, becuase in then people are not trying to study the things you have listed. Furthermore, for any major that requires mathmatics, it seems reasonable that people would understand how the math works. Thus, it is reasonable to require students in science to learn how math works. ![]() As it happens, for most sciences, math in a intimate part. Similarely, if someone if going to school to learn science, then they should be required to understand how things in science work. If someone is going to school to learn to ba a mechnic, then they should learn how a car works. ![]() If someone is going to school for electronics, then they should learn how a transitor works. Thus, if someone is going to school to learn how to fly an airplane, they should be required to learn how to fly it. In particulare, they are going to school in order to study how things in their major works. Fafalone, you are ignoring one important detail, people are going to school to study how something works.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |